Robinson Bradshaw Serves as Lead Counsel in Landmark Asbestos Ruling

PDF

Professionals

Practice Areas

Feb. 3, 2014

Robinson Bradshaw served as lead counsel and Moore & Van Allen PLLC as equity holder counsel, in a closely watched mass tort trial to determine the aggregate responsibility of Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC for present and projected future mesothelioma claims against it. Garlock is a subsidiary of EnPro Industries (EnPro).

In a Jan. 10, 2014 opinion, Judge George Hodges of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina ruled in favor of Garlock, estimating that its liability for present and future mesothelioma claims is $125 million. In so ruling, the Court rejected the position of representatives for asbestos claimants that Garlock’s liability exceeds $1 billion.

Garlock, a manufacturer of gaskets and packing, filed for bankruptcy in June 2010 because of thousands of pending and projected future lawsuits alleging that asbestos in encapsulated sealing products Garlock made decades ago caused them to contract asbestos-related diseases, including mesothelioma, an asbestos-related cancer. Garlock offered medical experts, industrial hygienists, economists, and other experts and witnesses to prove that claimants’ asbestos exposure from Garlock’s products was de minimus and that exposure from other products caused their asbestos diseases. Garlock and Coltec also offered evidence rebutting the position advanced by experts for mesothelioma claimants that hundreds of millions of dollars of settlements Garlock paid to resolve mesothelioma claims prior to its bankruptcy case provided a basis for determining Garlock’s future liability.

In his opinion, which can be seen under the investor relations tab on EnPro’s website, Judge Hodges ruled, “It is clear that Garlock’s products resulted in relatively low exposure to asbestos to a limited population and that its legal responsibility for causing mesothelioma is relatively de minimus.” Judge Hodges continued, “The best evidence of Garlock’s aggregate responsibility is the projection of its legal liability that takes into consideration causation, limited exposure and the contribution of exposures to other products. The court has determined that $125 million is sufficient to satisfy Garlock’s liability for the legitimate present and future mesothelioma claims against it.”

Robinson Bradshaw and Schachter Harris LLP, a Dallas trial firm, served as Garlock’s trial co-counsel while Moore & Van Allen represented Coltec, a direct EnPro subsidiary and sole equity holder of Garlock. Rayburn Cooper & Durham, which serves as general bankruptcy counsel for Garlock, provided advice and support throughout the trial.

Robinson Bradshaw attorneys participating at trial included Garland S. Cassada, Jonathan C. Krisko, Richard C. Worf Jr. and D. Blaine Sanders. Robinson Bradshaw lawyers also assisting at trial were Louis A. Bledsoe III, Ty E. Shaffer, David C. Kimball, Stuart L. Pratt and J. Thomas Clarkson. Satyra Riggins, Elise Deal and Pascal Joseph-Pauline provided paralegal and litigation technology support.

MVA attorneys involved in the trial included: Bankruptcy Member Dan Clodfelter, Litigation Member Mark Nebrig, Bankruptcy Member Hillary Crabtree, and Litigation Associate Taylor Stukes.

RCD attorneys providing trial support were C. Richard Rayburn Jr. and John R. Miller Jr.

Main Menu

Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A. Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek